I can appreciate his practical abilities. In an obituary a friend describes how, during a parachute malfunction in the 1970s, Scopinaro spent his time during the descent in working out how to best position himself on impact to minimise the probability of any of the 13 fractures he sustained leading to a penetrating injury of his abdominal or thoracic viscera, or brain. He survived, hitting the ground at ~100kph. So he can work things out. An impressively pragmatic person.
His operation works.
If anyone wants the details there is always Scopinaro's comprehensive (and possibly mildly biased) review from the early days here:
but the core is that it pretty well always works and while there can be catastrophic problems these can be relatively simply managed. Inject B vitamins sooner rather than later if your patient's brain malfunctions and perform revision surgery to increase the protein absorption section if they develop protein malnutrition. And a few others. All in the paper.
Here's what the operation does.
If that's not clear we can analyse it in a little more detail. Most of the small intestine is separated from the stomach and is simply left in place to act as a conduit for bile salts and pancreatic juices to be transferred to the far end of the small intestine. We can remove this conduit from the diagram and replace it with the large red arrow like this:
The last 250cm of the small intestine is plumbed directly to a truncated stomach and functions to absorb glucose and sucrose (using the brush border sucrase enzyme), highlighted in blue below:
The conduit provided by the rest of the small intestine delivers the bile salts and pancreatic secretions to the last 50cm of small intestine. This 50cm section is the only section of the gut which is able to digest starch, fat and protein, that's the region highlighted in red:
Under these condition it is impossible to overfeed using anything containing starch, fat or protein. People with this alteration to their digestive system usually eat around 3000kcal/d, with just under half of the food eaten going down the loo.
If you make them over-eat to a total of ~5000kcal/d by adding an extra 2000kcal of fat/starch there is absolutely no change to their weight over 15 days. I prefer not to think about the resulting changes to their already execrable lower bowel function during this period.
Here are the weight loss data from a case series who had a milder version of the above procedure. Roughly 70% loss initial excess weight (IEW) maintained for longer than 18 years:
The full operation as described above gives more like an 80% permanent loss of IEW.
You can develop all sorts of ideas about how this operation works physiologically, what bypassing the bulk of the small intestine does to GPL-1, GIP, vagal sectioning, endocananbinoids etc etc but the bottom line is that Scopinaro was a pragmatic surgeon and what he means by satiety and appetite may not be quite the same as I do.
Which puts us in a position to think about Tataranni's paper comparing BPD patients with normal weight people as regards insulin sensitivity and RQ. And maybe basal metabolic rate.
Peter
8 comments:
Fascinating. So is anyone still doing this surgery?
Apparently so...
Very interesting, thanks. And after these years and money spent still nobody knows, why it works? It slightly reminds me Dr Kempner's sugar and rice diet. It's one or other fuel, danger zone in between.
A cousin of my Father who had been a very large man had something far less dramatic done to 'cure' an ulcer - part of his stomach was removed. He spent the next half of his life, 40 years, as a very thin man. I remember him living on jars of jam on white bread and huge amounts of sugar in his tea but it having no apparent effect on his weight. He was also immensely strong.
Makes you wonder which branch of his vagus they sectioned and why it didn't grow back! Of course nowadays no one would sensibly expect him to gain weight on sugar or white bread in the absence of >8% LA in his diet... Actually, as a skinny kid, I remember eating sugar sandwiches, white bread of course. Can't remember if our house used Stork or butter. But Stork was a hard margarine so it might have been quite well hydrogenated.
I suppose falling without a parachute might make us think better? I know people that would have died without their by-pass operation. But, my focus is still trying to definitively know the cause. I have my favorites - but there is always confounding data.
The full thermogenesis paper is at https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/ajcn/60.3.320 Can't wait to see your take. If I eat in a way to maintain my weight, I have (along with many others) a problem with thermoregulation. I've thought of what foods might increase decoupling. (capsaicin Curcumin - MCT).
,.,.
I've looked, but made no progress in tyring to understand the geographical differences in obesity in the USA. You would think that it would be a hot research topic - it is not. I don't 100% trust the data, but I think this variation is quite real. Why the big difference between Colorado and Kansas? Kansas grows more crops - uses more and different farm chemicals? Is it something in the water?
,.,.
@passthecream - damaged vegus nerve? We don't really understand how the body-weight set-point works. No end of competing narratives.
On the sunject of stomachs scientists have only recently located Ötzi's stomach and analysed its contents - evidently the mummification made it difficult to find. Eventually there will be much less of Ötzi remaining however the contents were very high in fat with some meat both thought to be ibex, and a few grains. That's doubly interesting in view of him having 90% early Anatolian farmer DNA, which a
probably explains the arrow which killed him.
.. subject ..
Post a Comment